Tuesday, July 21, 2020
Off the Grid How to Map Engineering Competency
Off the Grid How to Map Engineering Competency Off the Grid How to Map Engineering Competency In todays maturing designing workforce, a rash of retirements and different variables represent a danger to innovation organizations. Those that dont completely comprehend the abilities and commitments of their architects chance losing their building know-how alongside their designers. The procedure known as competency mapping can enable these organizations to protect the information that shields their future. Competency mapping searches for the delicate aptitudes or practices that recognize powerful workers and possible pioneers. Be that as it may, in a calling as mind boggling as building, how is it conceivable to survey a people competency? A contextual analysis from the South American vitality organization Ecopetrol, S.A., gives one methodology. Ecopetrol and its advisor, RWD, LLC, propelled a task to comprehend the target abilities engineers need to work viably in a processing plant activity. RWD utilizes a matrix organization to gauge designing ability, build up expertise holes and recognize regions for preparing or different reactions. RWD follows a basic reason when mapping building competency. Since engineers are issue solvers naturally, the main two boundaries to gauge them against are: The Problem and How to Solve the Problem. That is the place the matrices come in. Those two boundaries structure the x-and y-tomahawks of two 2-dimensional networks that shed light on an architects competency. Matrix 1: The Outcome/Experience Map The Outcome/Experience (or O/E) map decays each necessary errand into an activity and an object of the activity. For instance, to outline undertaking of investigating blowers, your x-hub would be named Troubleshoot, and your y-hub would be Compressors. All recognizable building activities related with the blower assignments, for example, examination and documentation and vibration investigation, for instance would all go on the x-pivot. The y-pivot would comprise of the various sorts of blowers in the plant. Each kind of hardware and its relating activities needs its own O/E map, plotted similarly. Essentially, setting up the mapping model to all undertakings related with each control in designing will assist you with ensuring all errands on the rundown are outwardly particular and that the rundown is thorough. Framework 2: The Knowledge/Capability Map The Knowledge/Capability, or K/C, map characterizes the assets expected to set up an architect to play out a specific undertaking and recommends the right degree of expertise or psychological capacity the person in question must be viewed as able to carry out that responsibility. You make the K/C map by figuring out each errand on the O/E map. On this lattice, sort out your assets on the y-pivot by level of utility through and through. Partition the x-hub into three or four subjective degrees of intricacy. Every cell in the guide contains a competency explanation that coordinates a particular asset thing with a particular intellectual level on the x-hub. What Can You Do? The K/C maps fundamental use is to decide an architects capacities. You can utilize a finished K/C guide to make preparing programs that address a specialists holes in capability. At Ecopetrol, the control of procedure designing was picked as the main subject for competency mapping. In the wake of building a preparation intend to address discoveries in process designing, ensuing periods of the task would apply exercises figured out how to other building disciplines. Inside two months, it was the mechanical architects turn. The task concentrated first on two jobs: fixed-hardware designs and turning gear engineers. Separate groups of topic specialists were shaped for fixed-and pivoting hardware building. We originally made Outcome/Experience maps for both of these jobs before handling the K/C maps. The maps are intended to be utilized together to survey the competency the norm (through as is maps) and to picture the ideal outcomes (through to be maps). In this four-advance procedure, you first, make the to be maps. Each activity level ought to eventually have two finished to be maps outlining the suitable employment level for each undertaking on the O/E guide, and appointing a fitness level for all assets organized on the K/C map. Next, have each architect map their own present degree of experience and competency on clear K/C maps. These self-evaluations are the as is maps. At that point contrast and examine the with be maps and the as is maps to uncover each designers competency holes. At long last, suggest an activity plan for engineers who show competency holes. The educational plan guide can help coordinate the best preparing procedures. On the whole, these investigations are giving significant bits of knowledge that shape the companys preparing plan an issue more significant than any other time in recent memory considering the maturing designing workforce. All organizations much guide the skills of its present experts and find a way to supplant information in danger of vanishing. [Adapted from Mapping Competencies by Saidas Ranade, Cassio Tamara, Edgar Castiblanco,and Anibal Serna, for Mechanical Engineering, February 2010.] By and large, these examinations are giving significant bits of knowledge that shape the companys preparing plan an issue more significant than any time in recent memory considering the maturing designing workforce.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.